Stop the Press: More Fiscal and Monetary Stimulus won’t fix the ailing American Economy
The traditional response to financial problems by Latin American, African and other third world countries has often been to print more and more money on their printing presses, which then unleashed enormous inflation and devalued their currencies.
Surprisingly now however, the Government of the
Imagine a patient who goes to his doctor and says: “I want you to keep me healthy and to make me feel good all of the time. The way I know that I am healthy is by always feeling good. So never let me feel bad.”
The doctor obliges this unreasonable patient and at every visit prescribes more and more pills, but ultimately the patient becomes chronically ill. The patient has also stopped feeling good, a long time ago.
The doctor is the American government (Dr. Bush and Dr. Bernanke) and the patient is the American population who elects their government. The pills are fiscal and monetary stimulus.
This is not a perfect metaphor, but it comes close to the actual situation. The doctor has erroneously come to believe that with increasing doses of pharmaceuticals, no patient should ever get unhealthy or need to feel bad. So the doctor has prescribed these magic pills in ever increasing doses; regrettably, the patient is now looking and feeling just awful.
These expansive economic policies are not entirely new. They started gradually under Doctors Clinton and Greenspan at the beginning of the 1990’s. Since then,
A lot has been written on this distressing topic, particularly in one of my favourite economic newspapers, The Financial Times (http://www.ft.com/home/us). Regrettably, the American press is strangely silent about this potential economic nightmare.
Presidential candidates left and right are rushing to join the Stimulus Parade. The exception is Ron Paul, a little noticed Republican candidate, who seems to better understand this evolving economic crisis.
The real issue is no longer how to avoid a major recession in
Meanwhile, inflation has gained momentum and this unchecked rise of inflation will bedevil the US Government and US Federal Reserve years to come. We should pity the winner of the 2008 election, because he or she may get the worst economy since the one President Roosevelt inherited after the 1932 election.
But how does this all relate to the Big Debt Crisis? Very simply, when so much new money was created during the past 5 years at very low interest rates, lenders felt pressured to find a home, any home, for this ocean of excess liquidity. Credit standards were thrown out the window (e.g. subprime loans), since loans against houses were thought to be always collectible, even if the borrower was unable to pay. Now these bad loans are defaulting in catastrophic amounts and the entire financial system is in deepening danger.
Unfortunately, official government statistics are so distorted (please see my blog of June 9, 2007) that it will take a long while to unravel what has actually happened to the American economy. But at a minimum, the mighty American Dollar has been permanently devalued and de-throned as the world’s leading currency.
Lowering interest rates and decreasing taxes will not stop this economic freefall for more than a brief time. The “doctors” are just printing more money and devaluing their currency still further. A far better course would be to take the painful medicine of an economic correction bravely and then to return to more disciplined economic practices.
Sound economic management would involve strictly controlling monetary growth, as has been done in
Finally, the international trade balance really matters a lot. It is not good enough to blame this problem on lower wage counties like
There is much more to be said about sound management of an economy, but these are some of the core points. These structural changes could take up to a decade to accomplish. But unlike excessive monetary and fiscal stimulus, they would eventually produce a healthy economy.
(Note to readers outside of the
2 comments:
"A far better course would be to take the painful medicine of an economic correction bravely and then to return to more disciplined economic practices."
It seems to me the only rational approach to deal with this problem, however, I don't see A)a candidate willing to speak the truth and adopt this as part of his economic policy, or B) the American people voting anyone into office that took such an approach. Not when the others are promising a way that doesn't cost them as much personally. It seems to me to be the one place where democracy inevitably breaks down (and has throughout the history of the world). If someone has a solution, I'd sure like to hear it.
Interesting thoughts though.
Hi Paul,
what's your take on the chart on the second page of this PDF:
http://tinyurl.com/2vwxyp
Note that this value has since dropped to $-18B.
And this statement from the Fed regarding the nonborrowed reserves:
http://tinyurl.com/2qlupj
From Arjun.
Post a Comment